Roman wall painting can be divided into two main styles, namely parietal and architectural. Parietal wall painting was mainly used in domestic settings, and consisted of fresco paintings on the interior walls of dwellings. Architectural wall painting, on the other hand, was predominantly used in public buildings such as temples and basilicas. While both of these styles were popular during the Roman period, certain aspects of architectural wall painting were less characteristic than others.

One of the main differences between parietal and architectural wall paintings is their subject matter. Parietal paintings typically featured mythological scenes or depictions of everyday life such as hunting and farming activities; while architectural paintings tended to have a more formal and grandiose feel, often portraying events related to imperial history or featuring Roman gods or goddesses. As a result, representations that were not in line with classical Roman values were seldom found in architectural wall paintings. This would include portrayals of non-Greco-Roman deities or foreign scenes that did not flatly reinforce traditional Roman values.

Another feature that was less characteristic to Roman architectural wall painting was the use of vivid colors and bold compositions. During the mid-Republican period (around 400 BC), ancient Greek influence on Rome was at its peak and this had a direct impact on how Rome decorated its public spaces. The classicizing style from this era favored restrained colors, minimalistic designs and subtle details over bright colors and detailed compositions – something which differed greatly from what we see in Greek artworks from earlier centuries.

Finally, it is also worth noting that scenes depicting acts of violence or brutality were rarely found in Roman architectural wall painting – something which is much more common in Hellenistic artworks produced by Greeks around this time period. This could be linked to the Romans’ idea that decorating public spaces with images celebrating military triumphs or depicting violent acts could set a dangerous precedent for future generations by influencing citizens towards aggressive behavior instead of peaceful coexistence – something which would naturally go against their core ideals as a society.

Overall, there are many characteristics that differentiate parietal from architectural styles of Roman wall painting; however, some features were definitely less characteristic when it came to adorning public buildings during this era. These include representations that contradicted classical values, subdued colors rather than vivid ones, and avoiding depictions of violence or brutality towards others. All these traits helped create an atmosphere within public spaces that embodied what Rome valued most: namely, respect for tradition, adherence to societal norms, and a commitment to peace among its citizens.

CALL (248) 937-2745